In September 2021 UN Member States adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, with the pledge that “no one will be left behind” and to “endeavor to reach the furthest behind first”. This principle is ingrained in Target G of the Sendai Framework for Disaster risk reduction which is to “Substantially increase the availability of and access to multi-hazard early warning systems and disaster risk information and assessments to people by 2030.” Early warning saves lives, however one-third of the world’s people, mainly in the least developed countries and small island developing states, are still not covered by early warning systems. Access to EWS is not homogeneous. In ensuring that there is coverage however, explicit action must be taken to reach the poorest of the poor, curb inequalities, and confront discrimination to fast-track progress to ensure that all persons can access, understand and have the capacity to respond to the warnings.  This is the last mile of an effective MHEWS which has three critical components: multi-hazard, people centered and end to end. Recent disasters in the Caribbean and the Americas highlight the need to scale up actions that ensure EWS are inclusive. Vulnerable people, including disadvantaged people groups, undocumented migrants, older persons and persons with disabilities, women, and children among others must not be left behind.

Session objectives

1. To highlight the importance of leaving no one behind- addressing  inclusiveness and diversity in EWS.
2. To highlight who is being left behind and why (the key drivers) in the context of the Caribbean and the Americas.
3. To demonstrate how science and technology can be leveraged to bridge gaps in access- inequalities.
4. To show progress being made to ensure EWS reach the most vulnerable, to address inequalities and discrimination.
5. To provide recommendations to bridge the gap in EWS to ensure that no one is left behind, including to address the role of youth.

The panel is made up of two renowned world experts in development, risk management and climate change. The panel seeks to answer the main questions of a select group of women regarding the main challenges that risk management and climate change have in the processes related to prospective risk management and investment.

Allan and Andrew have been part of numerous joint projects, representing different institutions as experts in Risk Management, Climate Change and Development. For decades, they have developed a crusade to communicate the importance of reducing the risk of disasters faced by the exposed and vulnerable population.

Risk is in the DNA of development, which is why knowledge of risk, particularly its systematic, intensive and extensive expression that is present as a sine qua non condition, dictates concrete actions that increase the resilience of livelihoods and resistance. of the infrastructures.

The systemic risk perspective must propose a methodological response to act at different levels in a systemic way to complex economic, environmental, social and governance problems in order to move towards real sustainable development beyond 2030.

Session objectives

• Reflect on the state of the art of investment for disaster risk reduction and prospective risk management.
• Propose concrete ideas to promote public and private investment that reduces the risk of disasters.
• Evaluate the path that has been forged in risk management considering events that can trigger global crises such as pandemics, wars, hacks, etc.
• Rethinking the way forward for disaster risk management, within the framework of the climate change adaptation and mitigation agenda towards 2030, 2050 and 2100.

The Sendai Framework recognizes a systemic vision of risk and emphasizes the promotion of transversal and inter-institutional governance, as well as the inclusion of vulnerable populations. This parallel session will stimulate the understanding and appropriation of this perspective from a regional and community analytical perspective.

Session objectives

The purpose of the session is to share with the public the meaning of the concept of systemic risk, in such a way that its understanding, based on science, can be useful for all the actors involved in disaster risk reduction. This task will be carried out based on the following objectives:

1. Offer a comprehensive perspective of the dynamics, relationship, and interdependence between socioeconomic and environmental systems, whose vision incorporates the territorial, economic, social, political, institutional, community, and risk governance dimensions;
2. Highlight the importance that science-based risk communication should have, as well as decision-making in the context of the interaction of socioeconomic and environmental systems at their different territorial and administrative scales, from the local to the global, and their impact on disaster risk reduction.

The parallel session seeks to provide participants with a regional look at the infrastructure agenda in Latin America and the Caribbean, based on technical and political dialogue around the concept of "resilient infrastructure."

In order to achieve the objectives set for SP8, a balance will be sought between technical/scientific knowledge, regulatory principles/frameworks, examples of good practices, and the challenges of the future resilient infrastructure agenda.

It is essential to highlight that the concept of infrastructure will be addressed comprehensively, including: (i) physical infrastructure, digital infrastructure, and green infrastructure; (ii) regional, national and local perspectives; (iii) an active participation of the face-to-face and virtual attendees to the session in the selection of the questions for the presenters; (iv) a geographic and gender balance for the experts and the person in charge of moderation.

Session objectives

1. Present the panorama, context and needs of public and private investment in infrastructure in Latin America and the Caribbean.
2. Discuss the challenges and implications of systemic risks in the design, construction and operation of infrastructure.
3. Socialize advances in measuring the resilience of infrastructure.